|
Title: "Stewart Mandel: Alabama-LSU national title rematch remains unlikely; more Mailbag" Post by: WALL-E on September 19, 2012, 12:51:02 PM Published on Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:20:28 EDT
Following USC's upset, the talk has already begun: Could 'Bama and LSU be headed for a BCS title rematch? Stewart Mandel breaks down that possibility and much more in the Mailbag. More... (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/stewart_mandel/09/19/alabama-lsu-national-title-contenders/index.html?xid=si_ncaaf) Title: Re: "Stewart Mandel: Alabama-LSU national title rematch remains unlikely; more Mailbag" Post by: SUPERCOACH on September 19, 2012, 03:03:39 PM For a second I thought this was going to be another old article that managed to slip past my defenses, but it was actually posted a few minutes ago. A year later Alabama and LSU are still the two dominant teams and the only two who look like champions so far.
Title: Re: "Stewart Mandel: Alabama-LSU national title rematch remains unlikely; more Mailbag" Post by: Catch Prothro on September 19, 2012, 04:30:18 PM Quote This Saturday, I would watch Florida State-Clemson, Oklahoma-Kansas State and Notre Dame-Michigan if they were televised in separate time slots. Instead, I will watch only one of those night games and none earlier in the day because there are none worth watching. Do the networks really garner better overall ratings by having such premier games go head-to-head at night rather than spreading them throughout the day? -- Gary Swider, Sherman Oaks, Calif. The migration of more big games to prime time began six years ago when ABC figured out it could draw better ratings on Saturday nights by showing college football instead of scripted dramas or second-rate reality shows. We had previously counted on the broadcast networks (ABC, CBS and NBC) to show the biggest games in the afternoon, with evening spots primarily reserved for ESPN's SEC and ACC broadcasts or Fox Sports Net's old late-night Pac-10 games. But with FOX joining the fray this year, yet another marquee game moves from 3:30 p.m. ET to 7:30 or 8 (like Kansas State-Oklahoma). Even NBC is even doing it now, with Michigan-Notre Dame this week. The result, unfortunately, is that fans are now forced to pick and choose between high-profile matchups. Last year in Week 3, ABC garnered a very good 5.8 rating for its prime time game, Oklahoma-Florida State. A year earlier it notched a 4.7 for Texas-Texas Tech. This year it got just a 3.2 for Notre Dame-Michigan State. ESPN's Florida-Tennessee broadcast, which overlapped during the second half, produced a 3.1, and FOX's USC-Stanford showing netted a 2.5. Granted, there was a lot more buildup leading into that Oklahoma-Florida State game last year, but networks can usually count on Notre Dame to draw a big audience, especially against a top-10 team. However, if you combine the ratings for the head-to-head ABC and FOX games you get 5.7 -- almost identical to ABC's number last year. On the bright side, the afternoon options should improve once teams get into conference play and there are multiple games of interest in each league. Unfortunately, though, the cluttered prime time lineup is here to stay. Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/stewart_mandel/09/19/alabama-lsu-national-title-contenders/index.html#ixzz26xBK0XI2 |