Crimson Red Sports

Around Campus => President's Mansion => Topic started by: BAMAWV on October 08, 2012, 04:44:55 AM



Title: Obama's Green Agenda (or scheme)
Post by: BAMAWV on October 08, 2012, 04:44:55 AM
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/on-energy/2012/05/02/al-armendarizs-crucify-slip-reveals-epas-true-nature

Quote
The president's energy policies have in reality killed job-creating projects, denied robust offshore production, and hamstrung domestic economic development. At the same time, tax policies have decreased U.S. competitiveness abroad. And despite anemic job creation, agencies continue to hobble private businesses with increasingly complex and numerous regulations.


Title: Re: Obama's Green Agenda (or scheme)
Post by: pmull on October 08, 2012, 11:40:26 AM
Romney hit him hard about his green agenda in the debate. BHO had no response.


Title: Re: Obama's Green Agenda (or scheme)
Post by: ricky023 on October 08, 2012, 12:24:51 PM
Romney hit him hard about his green agenda in the debate. BHO had no response.


Well his agenda is nothing more than taking money from these groups for his own personal gain. He doesn't know how to implement a way to make the economy grow. He wants the U.S. tore down as much as possible and the democrats wants us torn down right along with him. There is absolutely no way a person that calls them self a Christian could ever vote for a man like that. RTR! 


Title: Re: Obama's Green Agenda (or scheme)
Post by: BAMAWV on October 08, 2012, 01:23:55 PM
Romney hit him hard about his green agenda in the debate. BHO had no response.
Yeah he did. Obama started complaining about the taxpayers subsidizing the oil industry. Romney pointed out that cars run on fossil fuels, not windmills or solar panels. He also related that the Obama administration has given those green companies fifty times what goes to the oil industry. Besides, most of the oil and gas subsidies go to small, privately owned companies. The more oil and gas on the market, the more oil and gas tax revenue goes to Washington. 17 solar and wind projects are also using 100s of thousands of federal acres.

EPA emission restrictions during a recessionary period is choking the life out of industrialized America. Borrowing money from China to invest in green ventures destined for failure is stealing from future generations. Federally funding (your tax $) liberal agendas is threatening the very core of what we hoped to pass to the next generation - a thriving, healthy economy that used to be a model for all the world to see. 


Title: Re: Obama's Green Agenda (or scheme)
Post by: BAMAWV on October 08, 2012, 01:37:08 PM
Romney hit him hard about his green agenda in the debate. BHO had no response.


Well his agenda is nothing more than taking money from these groups for his own personal gain. He doesn't know how to implement a way to make the economy grow. He wants the U.S. tore down as much as possible and the democrats wants us torn down right along with him. There is absolutely no way a person that calls them self a Christian could ever vote for a man like that. RTR! 

You want to know why the dems aren't screaming for gun control lately. They are so politically driven that the votes mean way more than any perceived threat. But also, they have worked behind the scenes through the EPA to label the lead in bullets as toxic substances to shut down hunting on federal land. They got tired of just going after the fully automatic weapons and are using this back door to go after hunters under the auspices of saving the environment.


Title: Re: Obama's Green Agenda (or scheme)
Post by: pmull on October 08, 2012, 02:27:50 PM
Romney hit him hard about his green agenda in the debate. BHO had no response.
Yeah he did. Obama started complaining about the taxpayers subsidizing the oil industry. Romney pointed out that cars run on fossil fuels, not windmills or solar panels. He also related that the Obama administration has given those green companies fifty times what goes to the oil industry. Besides, most of the oil and gas subsidies go to small, privately owned companies. The more oil and gas on the market, the more oil and gas tax revenue goes to Washington. 17 solar and wind projects are also using 100s of thousands of federal acres.

EPA emission restrictions during a recessionary period is choking the life out of industrialized America. Borrowing money from China to invest in green ventures destined for failure is stealing from future generations. Federally funding (your tax $) liberal agendas is threatening the very core of what we hoped to pass to the next generation - a thriving, healthy economy that used to be a model for all the world to see. 

I guess I should have said BHO did not have a decent response. Romney wore him out on this issue. He pointed out all the failed companies that money was dumped into. I forget the number but told told how many teachers could be hired for the money invested in green energy. Romney specifically pointed out BHO regulations that is hendering coal production.


Title: Re: Obama's Green Agenda (or scheme)
Post by: BAMAWV on October 08, 2012, 02:51:14 PM
Romney hit him hard about his green agenda in the debate. BHO had no response.
Yeah he did. Obama started complaining about the taxpayers subsidizing the oil industry. Romney pointed out that cars run on fossil fuels, not windmills or solar panels. He also related that the Obama administration has given those green companies fifty times what goes to the oil industry. Besides, most of the oil and gas subsidies go to small, privately owned companies. The more oil and gas on the market, the more oil and gas tax revenue goes to Washington. 17 solar and wind projects are also using 100s of thousands of federal acres.

EPA emission restrictions during a recessionary period is choking the life out of industrialized America. Borrowing money from China to invest in green ventures destined for failure is stealing from future generations. Federally funding (your tax $) liberal agendas is threatening the very core of what we hoped to pass to the next generation - a thriving, healthy economy that used to be a model for all the world to see.  

I guess I should have said BHO did not have a decent response. Romney wore him out on this issue. He pointed out all the failed companies that money was dumped into. I forget the number but told told how many teachers could be hired for the money invested in green energy. Romney specifically pointed out BHO regulations that is hendering coal production.

I thought they said $90 billion. They'd still want more (the teachers).