|
Title: What's the Dirtiest College Football Program-Rivals Article Post by: Marshal Dillon on April 22, 2011, 08:23:04 PM This is gonna give a lot of Tide fans major heartburn.
http://collegefootball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1214532 Title: Re: What's the Dirtiest College Football Program-Rivals Article Post by: BAMAWV on April 22, 2011, 08:32:22 PM Quote The primary targets this year have been Auburn, Ohio State and Oregon, though sights always are set on USC and Alabama, too. I hate being cast in the same light as USC. For what? The BS Callaway fiasco? Title: Re: What's the Dirtiest College Football Program-Rivals Article Post by: BAMAWV on April 22, 2011, 08:36:35 PM Seems other fanbases are not pleased with Olin Buchanan:
http://mgoblog.com/diaries/olin-buchanan-fool-updated Title: Re: What's the Dirtiest College Football Program-Rivals Article Post by: ricky023 on April 23, 2011, 12:12:06 AM LOL, I get a great laugh cause we passed through those days and now we have a coach who does not tolerate wrong doings. RTR!
Title: Re: What's the Dirtiest College Football Program-Rivals Article Post by: XBAMA on April 23, 2011, 12:31:26 AM 1) auburn
2) aubarn 3) aubarn 4-10) see 1-3 place Title: Re: What's the Dirtiest College Football Program-Rivals Article Post by: Chechem on April 23, 2011, 03:35:46 AM I wouldn't even respond to this thread (this article), but it was already at the top of the thread list, so no harm. This writer is behind in his data and biased in his interpretation. That said, he's an idiot.
That is all. Title: Re: What's the Dirtiest College Football Program-Rivals Article Post by: BAMAWV on April 23, 2011, 08:19:12 AM I wouldn't even respond to this thread (this article), but it was already at the top of the thread list, so no harm. This writer is behind in his data and biased in his interpretation. That said, he's an idiot. Hence the Olin Buchanan is a Fool link I provided above.That is all. Title: Re: What's the Dirtiest College Football Program-Rivals Article Post by: Reelvalue on April 23, 2011, 10:05:06 AM THEY NEED TO GO BACK 40 YRS..NOT 20..AND NOTICE HOW MANY TIMES YOU SEE AUBURN...
|