|
Title: WSJ Article About THE Game and JF Post by: ALTideUp on September 12, 2013, 05:35:15 PM A well written WSJ article (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323595004579069340943051488.html) about JF-fatigue, hype, and the image problems of big-time college football.
Title: Re: WSJ Article About THE Game and JF Post by: N.AL-Tider on September 13, 2013, 06:34:25 AM Another article about JF...and this one about the JF fatigue... :yawn:
Title: Re: WSJ Article About THE Game and JF Post by: Chechem on September 13, 2013, 06:41:16 AM Last year, people were saying JF was good for college football. Most of those said it because A&M beat #1 Alabama and because it propelled A&M into the top of the SEC.
Those people are now saying JF represents everything that is bad about college football: ego, self-centered antics, drunken behavior, cheating the system... :popcorn2: Title: Re: WSJ Article About THE Game and JF Post by: N.AL-Tider on September 13, 2013, 08:25:41 AM Last year, people were saying JF was good for college football. Most of those said it because A&M beat #1 Alabama and because it propelled A&M into the top of the SEC. Basically everything good for college football... ;)Those people are now saying JF represents everything that is bad about college football: ego, self-centered antics, drunken behavior, cheating the system... :popcorn2: Title: Re: WSJ Article About THE Game and JF Post by: SUPERCOACH on September 13, 2013, 11:06:00 AM Last year, people were saying JF was good for college football. Most of those said it because A&M beat #1 Alabama and because it propelled A&M into the top of the SEC. Basically everything good for college football... ;)Those people are now saying JF represents everything that is bad about college football: ego, self-centered antics, drunken behavior, cheating the system... :popcorn2: :lol: Clever. |