|
Title: pickem issue Post by: roll tide roll on September 15, 2015, 05:21:00 PM So, week 1, I go 6 - 4.
Then, week 2, I go 6 - 4. When I look at the overall leader board I am in a 5-way tie for 6th place. In sole possession of 5th place is Hannibal Lecter, MD. Dr. Lecter failed to pick 3 of the games from week 1 and yet he received no apparent penalty for not picking. His 3 no-picks should be counted as losses and there should be a 6-way tie for 5th place. Thanks for taking my call. Roll Tide! Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: N.AL-Tider on September 15, 2015, 05:35:37 PM When I look at the overall results it just shows the week 2 results... ???
Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: 2Stater on September 15, 2015, 05:57:32 PM We get Mulligans.
Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: SUPERCOACH on September 15, 2015, 06:21:47 PM Right now it only shows your best score since we get to drop our 2 lowest scores. Once we get to week 4, it will start combining your 2 best and dropping your 2 worst.
Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: SUPERCOACH on September 15, 2015, 06:28:28 PM So, week 1, I go 6 - 4. Then, week 2, I go 6 - 4. When I look at the overall leader board I am in a 5-way tie for 6th place. In sole possession of 5th place is Hannibal Lecter, MD. Dr. Lecter failed to pick 3 of the games from week 1 and yet he received no apparent penalty for not picking. His 3 no-picks should be counted as losses and there should be a 6-way tie for 5th place. Thanks for taking my call. Roll Tide! If you don't get all of your picks in on time the missing pick is counted as a push. I didn't want to punish folks for not getting their picks in before a Thursday night game, for example. The flip side is that they don't have a chance to get that game correct either. So if you put in all 10 picks, you have more chances to get 7 correct and beat that 6-1 guy. Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: roll tide roll on September 15, 2015, 08:55:49 PM So, week 1, I go 6 - 4. Then, week 2, I go 6 - 4. When I look at the overall leader board I am in a 5-way tie for 6th place. In sole possession of 5th place is Hannibal Lecter, MD. Dr. Lecter failed to pick 3 of the games from week 1 and yet he received no apparent penalty for not picking. His 3 no-picks should be counted as losses and there should be a 6-way tie for 5th place. Thanks for taking my call. Roll Tide! If you don't get all of your picks in on time the missing pick is counted as a push. I didn't want to punish folks for not getting their picks in before a Thursday night game, for example. The flip side is that they don't have a chance to get that game correct either. So if you put in all 10 picks, you have more chances to get 7 correct and beat that 6-1 guy. Fair enough. We disagree on methodology, but I will be alright. :tinfoil: Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: Chechem on September 16, 2015, 06:10:47 AM Remember high school? 6/10 (60%) is fail.
HTH. Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: KoKoPuf on September 16, 2015, 09:17:12 AM The first week I didn't get my Thursday picks on time but I obviously would have picked the winners. If you don't believe me I can go back and pick them now.
Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: Catch Prothro on September 16, 2015, 09:30:19 AM So, week 1, I go 6 - 4. Then, week 2, I go 6 - 4. When I look at the overall leader board I am in a 5-way tie for 6th place. In sole possession of 5th place is Hannibal Lecter, MD. Dr. Lecter failed to pick 3 of the games from week 1 and yet he received no apparent penalty for not picking. His 3 no-picks should be counted as losses and there should be a 6-way tie for 5th place. Thanks for taking my call. Roll Tide! If you don't get all of your picks in on time the missing pick is counted as a push. I didn't want to punish folks for not getting their picks in before a Thursday night game, for example. The flip side is that they don't have a chance to get that game correct either. So if you put in all 10 picks, you have more chances to get 7 correct and beat that 6-1 guy. Fair enough. We disagree on methodology, but I will be alright. :tinfoil: Really it is the only way the computer can work it given that we drop two bad weeks and don't punish for non-picks, except as a lost opportunity. Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: SUPERCOACH on September 16, 2015, 01:56:26 PM The first week I didn't get my Thursday picks on time but I obviously would have picked the winners. If you don't believe me I can go back and pick them now. :lol2: Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: SUPERCOACH on September 16, 2015, 01:58:46 PM So, week 1, I go 6 - 4. Then, week 2, I go 6 - 4. When I look at the overall leader board I am in a 5-way tie for 6th place. In sole possession of 5th place is Hannibal Lecter, MD. Dr. Lecter failed to pick 3 of the games from week 1 and yet he received no apparent penalty for not picking. His 3 no-picks should be counted as losses and there should be a 6-way tie for 5th place. Thanks for taking my call. Roll Tide! If you don't get all of your picks in on time the missing pick is counted as a push. I didn't want to punish folks for not getting their picks in before a Thursday night game, for example. The flip side is that they don't have a chance to get that game correct either. So if you put in all 10 picks, you have more chances to get 7 correct and beat that 6-1 guy. Fair enough. We disagree on methodology, but I will be alright. :tinfoil: :lol2: Why didn't you go 7-3 instead of 6-4? :dunno: Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: ricky023 on September 16, 2015, 02:57:23 PM Well don't worry my neighbors and friends. I have the bottom of the totem pole and it is on my broad shoulders. I will not let you fall. I predict a perfect pickem this week of 0-10.
RTR! Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: XBAMA on September 16, 2015, 03:53:16 PM we all suck at this picking anyway :dunno:
so it's really no big deal :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: btw .... I want to do away with the spread of the points :eyeroll: Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: N.AL-Tider on September 16, 2015, 03:59:07 PM we all suck at this picking anyway :dunno: Me too. Picking against the spread is tough, just let me pick the winner or the loser... :-[so it's really no big deal :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: btw .... I want to do away with the spread of the points :eyeroll: Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: Chechem on September 16, 2015, 06:11:20 PM we all suck at this picking anyway :dunno: Me too. Picking against the spread is tough, just let me pick the winner or the loser... :-[so it's really no big deal :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: btw .... I want to do away with the spread of the points :eyeroll: If we did, the Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: N.AL-Tider on September 16, 2015, 06:12:36 PM we all suck at this picking anyway :dunno: Me too. Picking against the spread is tough, just let me pick the winner or the loser... :-[so it's really no big deal :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: btw .... I want to do away with the spread of the points :eyeroll: If we did, the Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: roll tide roll on September 16, 2015, 07:26:56 PM Remember high school? 6/10 (60%) is fail. HTH. Ever been to Vegas? 6/10 is doing pretty well. Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: roll tide roll on September 16, 2015, 07:30:38 PM So, week 1, I go 6 - 4. Then, week 2, I go 6 - 4. When I look at the overall leader board I am in a 5-way tie for 6th place. In sole possession of 5th place is Hannibal Lecter, MD. Dr. Lecter failed to pick 3 of the games from week 1 and yet he received no apparent penalty for not picking. His 3 no-picks should be counted as losses and there should be a 6-way tie for 5th place. Thanks for taking my call. Roll Tide! If you don't get all of your picks in on time the missing pick is counted as a push. I didn't want to punish folks for not getting their picks in before a Thursday night game, for example. The flip side is that they don't have a chance to get that game correct either. So if you put in all 10 picks, you have more chances to get 7 correct and beat that 6-1 guy. Fair enough. We disagree on methodology, but I will be alright. :tinfoil: :lol2: Why didn't you go 7-3 instead of 6-4? :dunno: Week 1: Northwestern surprised many, Week 2: It is obvious now that UGA is weak. Title: Re: pickem issue Post by: roll tide roll on September 16, 2015, 07:32:39 PM So, week 1, I go 6 - 4. Then, week 2, I go 6 - 4. When I look at the overall leader board I am in a 5-way tie for 6th place. In sole possession of 5th place is Hannibal Lecter, MD. Dr. Lecter failed to pick 3 of the games from week 1 and yet he received no apparent penalty for not picking. His 3 no-picks should be counted as losses and there should be a 6-way tie for 5th place. Thanks for taking my call. Roll Tide! If you don't get all of your picks in on time the missing pick is counted as a push. I didn't want to punish folks for not getting their picks in before a Thursday night game, for example. The flip side is that they don't have a chance to get that game correct either. So if you put in all 10 picks, you have more chances to get 7 correct and beat that 6-1 guy. Fair enough. We disagree on methodology, but I will be alright. :tinfoil: Really it is the only way the computer can work it given that we drop two bad weeks and don't punish for non-picks, except as a lost opportunity. Sure, blame it on computers. :eyeroll: |