|
Title: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: hscoach on October 22, 2015, 06:27:08 PM I thought I would look at what teams that played Bama has averaged offensively for the year and what they gained vs Bama,
1. Wis: averages: 405.6 vs Bama 268 = negative 137.6 2. ULM: averages: 328 vs Bama 92 = negative 236 3. A&M: averages: 453 vs Bama 316 = negative 137 They also got 5 additional offensive possessions because of the picks and fumble on the punt. 4. Ark: averages: 433.3 vs Bama 220 = negative 213.3 5. UGa: averages: 429 vs Bama 299 = negative 130 6. MTU: averages 443.9 vs Bama 275 = negative 168.9 7. OM: averages 521 vs Bama 433 = negative 88. They also had two fluke plays that went for 139 yards plus they had 3 extra possessions because of ints. Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: 2Stater on October 22, 2015, 06:50:45 PM Very impressive, Coach. I hope they keep it up Saturday.
Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: Jamos on October 22, 2015, 07:18:28 PM You are amazing with your numbers. :clap:
Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: hscoach on October 22, 2015, 07:27:59 PM You are amazing with your numbers. :clap: I see I can impress you easily. Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: Catch Prothro on October 22, 2015, 07:29:20 PM I thought I would look at what teams that played Bama has averaged offensively for the year and what they gained vs Bama, 1. Wis: averages: 405.6 vs Bama 268 = negative 137.6 2. ULM: averages: 328 vs Bama 92 = negative 236 3. A&M: averages: 453 vs Bama 316 = negative 137 They also got 5 additional offensive possessions because of the picks and fumble on the punt. 4. Ark: averages: 433.3 vs Bama 220 = negative 213.3 5. UGa: averages: 429 vs Bama 299 = negative 130 6. MTU: averages 443.9 vs Bama 275 = negative 168.9 7. OM: averages 521 vs Bama 433 = negative 88. They also had two fluke plays that went for 139 yards plus they had 3 extra possessions because of ints. Great job, thanks for your efforts. :clap: Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: SUPERCOACH on October 23, 2015, 08:05:52 AM Good stuff coach.
:clap: Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: lstephen on October 23, 2015, 09:28:16 AM Interesting stuff, coach. Thanks! #+
Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: SUPERCOACH on October 23, 2015, 11:47:23 AM If I get bored I might do the same stat for Auburn. :lol2:
Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: hscoach on October 23, 2015, 11:58:10 AM If I get bored I might do the same stat for Auburn. :lol2: That may blow up your calculator. Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: ricky023 on October 23, 2015, 12:20:52 PM The one thing the defense shows is it's capable of holding any team. I wonder if this will have an effect on the group that will be ranking for the playoffs? RTR!
Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: SUPERCOACH on October 23, 2015, 01:35:22 PM If I get bored I might do the same stat for Auburn. :lol2: That may blow up your calculator. What does this mean? ∞ ??? :dunno: Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: hscoach on October 23, 2015, 01:37:18 PM If I get bored I might do the same stat for Auburn. :lol2: That may blow up your calculator. What does this mean? ∞ ??? :dunno: You may be putting in so many numbers the calculator can't handle them. Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: Old Tider on October 23, 2015, 09:27:14 PM I thought I would look at what teams that played Bama has averaged offensively for the year and what they gained vs Bama, 1. Wis: averages: 405.6 vs Bama 268 = negative 137.6 2. ULM: averages: 328 vs Bama 92 = negative 236 3. A&M: averages: 453 vs Bama 316 = negative 137 They also got 5 additional offensive possessions because of the picks and fumble on the punt. 4. Ark: averages: 433.3 vs Bama 220 = negative 213.3 5. UGa: averages: 429 vs Bama 299 = negative 130 6. MTU: averages 443.9 vs Bama 275 = negative 168.9 7. OM: averages 521 vs Bama 433 = negative 88. They also had two fluke plays that went for 139 yards plus they had 3 extra possessions because of ints. Not to create more work for you, Coach, but I suspect the rushing only stats would be even more impressive. Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: N.AL-Tider on October 23, 2015, 09:33:02 PM If I get bored I might do the same stat for Auburn. :lol2: That may blow up your calculator. What does this mean? ∞ ??? :dunno: You may be putting in so many numbers the calculator can't handle them. Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: hscoach on October 24, 2015, 01:37:13 PM I thought I would look at what teams that played Bama has averaged offensively for the year and what they gained vs Bama, 1. Wis: averages: 405.6 vs Bama 268 = negative 137.6 2. ULM: averages: 328 vs Bama 92 = negative 236 3. A&M: averages: 453 vs Bama 316 = negative 137 They also got 5 additional offensive possessions because of the picks and fumble on the punt. 4. Ark: averages: 433.3 vs Bama 220 = negative 213.3 5. UGa: averages: 429 vs Bama 299 = negative 130 6. MTU: averages 443.9 vs Bama 275 = negative 168.9 7. OM: averages 521 vs Bama 433 = negative 88. They also had two fluke plays that went for 139 yards plus they had 3 extra possessions because of ints. Not to create more work for you, Coach, but I suspect the rushing only stats would be even more impressive. Wis: avg: 154.6 vs Bama 40 = negative 114.6 ULM: avg: 106.8 vs Bama 9 = negative 97.8 A&M: avg: 162 vs Bama 32 = negative 130 MT: avg: 143.3 vs Bama 86 = negative 57 OM: avg: 167.1 vs Bama 92 = negative 75.1 Ga: avg: 215.6 vs Bama 193 = negative 22.6 Ark: avg:177.3 vs Bama 44 = negative 133.3 Title: Re: Got a little bored so I did a little research: Post by: Old Tider on October 24, 2015, 01:58:30 PM I thought I would look at what teams that played Bama has averaged offensively for the year and what they gained vs Bama, 1. Wis: averages: 405.6 vs Bama 268 = negative 137.6 2. ULM: averages: 328 vs Bama 92 = negative 236 3. A&M: averages: 453 vs Bama 316 = negative 137 They also got 5 additional offensive possessions because of the picks and fumble on the punt. 4. Ark: averages: 433.3 vs Bama 220 = negative 213.3 5. UGa: averages: 429 vs Bama 299 = negative 130 6. MTU: averages 443.9 vs Bama 275 = negative 168.9 7. OM: averages 521 vs Bama 433 = negative 88. They also had two fluke plays that went for 139 yards plus they had 3 extra possessions because of ints. Not to create more work for you, Coach, but I suspect the rushing only stats would be even more impressive. Wis: avg: 154.6 vs Bama 40 = negative 114.6 ULM: avg: 106.8 vs Bama 9 = negative 97.8 A&M: avg: 162 vs Bama 32 = negative 130 MT: avg: 143.3 vs Bama 86 = negative 57 OM: avg: 167.1 vs Bama 92 = negative 75.1 Ga: avg: 215.6 vs Bama 193 = negative 22.6 Ark: avg:177.3 vs Bama 44 = negative 133.3 Wow, many thanks, Coach. I didn't think of it, but of course the negatives are lower because of the smaller figures. This really shows how our Bama destroys the running game. |