|
Title: Week 2 committee vote Post by: 2Stater on November 10, 2015, 06:11:05 PM They're announcing week 2 of the selection committee votes. They are speculating where everyone will fall. Galloway, with turd breath, puts Bama at 3. Kannell thinks they are no better than #4, and he puts them there begrudgingly. Here is my shocked and amazed face:
(http://33.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5ff99tjIa1qfl1ji.jpg) Herbie thinks Bama should be #2. Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: 2Stater on November 10, 2015, 06:12:17 PM 1. Clemson
2. Bama 3. tOSU 4. Drum roll................... Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: 2Stater on November 10, 2015, 06:13:13 PM 4. Notre Dame
My shocked and amazed face: (http://33.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5ff99tjIa1qfl1ji.jpg) Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: Marshal Dillon on November 10, 2015, 07:28:33 PM I love it! No Baylor, no Okie State (no big 12), & no Iowa.
:jump: :jump: :jump: Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: N.AL-Tider on November 10, 2015, 07:35:21 PM I would love for the final ranking to be just like that so Bama can beat OSU this year and coach Saban can give Meyer heart palpitations again and then put a whoopin on the winner of Clemson vs. ND... :clap:
Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: Catch Prothro on November 10, 2015, 07:48:02 PM Here are the full rankings:
1 Clemson 9-0 — 2 Alabama 8-1 2 3 Ohio State 9-0 — 4 Notre Dame 8-1 1 5 Iowa 9-0 4 6 Baylor 8-0 — 7 Stanford 8-1 4 8 Oklahoma State 9-0 6 9 LSU 7-1 7 10 Utah 8-1 2 11 Florida 8-1 1 12 Oklahoma 8-1 3 13 Michigan State 8-1 6 14 Michigan 7-2 3 15 TCU 8-1 7 16 Florida State 7-2 — 17 Mississippi State 7-2 3 18 Northwestern 7-2 3 19 UCLA 7-2 4 20 Navy 7-1 — 21 Memphis 8-1 8 22 Temple 8-1 — 23 North Carolina 8-1 — 24 Houston 9-0 1 25 Wisconsin 8-2 Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: Chechem on November 10, 2015, 07:55:07 PM (http://33.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5ff99tjIa1qfl1ji.jpg)
i.e., no surprise Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: 2Stater on November 10, 2015, 08:06:02 PM I would love for the final ranking to be just like that so Bama can beat OSU this year and coach Saban can give Meyer heart palpitations again and then put a whoopin on the winner of Clemson vs. ND... :clap: Me too. But if Iowa wins out, they will be in. So likely would the survivor of Okie Light, Baylor and Oklahoma in the Big 12. But if ND wins out, especially with a win over Stanford, I think the Big 12 gets left out again. And don't sleep on NC. They can beat Clempson in the ACCCG. They are playing as well as anybody, right now. Still a long way to go. Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: Marshal Dillon on November 10, 2015, 08:29:10 PM I would love for the final ranking to be just like that so Bama can beat OSU this year and coach Saban can give Meyer heart palpitations again and then put a whoopin on the winner of Clemson vs. ND... :clap: Me too. But if Iowa wins out, they will be in. So likely would the survivor of Okie Light, Baylor and Oklahoma in the Big 12. But if ND wins out, especially with a win over Stanford, I think the Big 12 gets left out again. And don't sleep on NC. They can beat Clempson in the ACCCG. They are playing as well as anybody, right now. Still a long way to go. Yep, total chaos is within the realm of reality. Michigan beats Ohio State, Michigan St beats OSU, Iowa loses to Michigan State. Okie State loses to Oklahoma & Oklahoma beats Baylor. That would probably leave Alabama, Clemson, Notre Dame/Stanford & maybe Michigan State in the playoff. :stars: Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: McBaman on November 10, 2015, 11:13:18 PM We are #2 with this selection committee. As long as we keep winning, I don't care what else happens. Winning cures everything!
Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: Chechem on November 11, 2015, 06:19:54 AM We are #2 with this selection committee. As long as we keep winning, I don't care what else happens. Winning cures everything! ^^^YUP^^^ Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: SUPERCOACH on November 11, 2015, 10:14:38 AM I think a wise poster on this forum said several weeks ago that we control our own destiny and that Ole Miss would lose at least one more game. :dunno:
:lol2: Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: 2Stater on November 11, 2015, 10:32:14 AM I think a wise poster on this forum said several weeks ago that we control our own destiny and that Ole Miss would lose at least one more game. :dunno: :lol2: (http://www.intesolv.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/crowd.jpg) Which one? :lol2: Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: SUPERCOACH on November 11, 2015, 10:34:30 AM I think a wise poster on this forum said several weeks ago that we control our own destiny and that Ole Miss would lose at least one more game. :dunno: :lol2: (http://www.intesolv.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/crowd.jpg) Which one? :lol2: He goes by Waldo. :lol2: Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: McBaman on November 11, 2015, 11:10:50 AM I think a wise poster on this forum said several weeks ago that we control our own destiny and that Ole Miss would lose at least one more game. :dunno: :lol2: Who was that masked man??? Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: 2Stater on November 11, 2015, 11:14:53 AM I think a wise poster on this forum said several weeks ago that we control our own destiny and that Ole Miss would lose at least one more game. :dunno: :lol2: (http://www.intesolv.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/crowd.jpg) Which one? :lol2: He goes by Waldo. :lol2: :lol: Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: Old Tider on November 11, 2015, 11:19:26 AM Only goes to show what a great job our coaches and players have done since the Ole Miss game. If undefeated, we would be ranked 1. We're 2, almost as if the loss had never happened.
Title: Re: Week 2 committee vote Post by: 2Stater on November 11, 2015, 11:34:44 AM Only goes to show what a great job our coaches and players have done since the Ole Miss game. If undefeated, we would be ranked 1. We're 2, almost as if the loss had never happened. I posted before that I prefer us not to be #1. We play better historically, when we aren't the front runner. |