|
Title: NCAA Probation for teams not named Alabama Post by: SeniorTSM on December 13, 2011, 07:59:29 AM First let me say I am not a :tinfoil: guy but today a radio show (Bill King) was talking about USC being back next year, and I was shocked that their post season ban would be lifted next year.
I dont get how these teams got away with doing pretty much the same thing Bama did and they come out with little more than a slap on the wrist. USC got the most but still far less than Bama, OSU hell they still get a bowl game this year Miami...did they get anything???? UNC........who knows :popcorn2: Title: Re: NCAA Probation for teams not named Alabama Post by: 2Stater on December 13, 2011, 08:50:52 AM When you're the New York Yankees of college football, there's gonna be haters, even the NZAA.
Title: Re: NCAA Probation for teams not named Alabama Post by: Marshal Dillon on December 13, 2011, 10:10:33 AM I think USC lost 30 scholarships, but that doesn't start to affect you until about 3 years afterwards when all the good players have left and you have to start dealing with reduced scholarship players, less quality players, and less depth.
:popcorn2: Title: Re: NCAA Probation for teams not named Alabama Post by: 2Stater on December 13, 2011, 10:32:54 AM I think USC lost 30 scholarships, but that doesn't start to affect you until about 3 years afterwards when all the good players have left and you have to start dealing with reduced scholarship players, less quality players, and less depth. :popcorn2: True. That's what eventually took it's toll on the Tide during the Shula years. Title: Re: NCAA Probation for teams not named Alabama Post by: Marshal Dillon on December 13, 2011, 10:56:42 AM I think USC lost 30 scholarships, but that doesn't start to affect you until about 3 years afterwards when all the good players have left and you have to start dealing with reduced scholarship players, less quality players, and less depth. :popcorn2: True. That's what eventually took it's toll on the Tide during the Shula years. That's exactly the example I was thinking of when I typed that. :D Title: Re: NCAA Probation for teams not named Alabama Post by: 2Stater on December 13, 2011, 11:47:35 AM I think USC lost 30 scholarships, but that doesn't start to affect you until about 3 years afterwards when all the good players have left and you have to start dealing with reduced scholarship players, less quality players, and less depth. :popcorn2: True. That's what eventually took it's toll on the Tide during the Shula years. That's exactly the example I was thinking of when I typed that. :D Don't worry, USC, in 5-7 years, you'll be good as new. :popcorn2: Title: Re: NCAA Probation for teams not named Alabama Post by: SeniorTSM on December 20, 2011, 02:22:42 PM :deadhorse:
So tOSU gets little because someone refused to talk to the NCAA. Guess we know what to do now. |