|
Title: Dan Wetzel...SMH Post by: SeniorTSM on January 10, 2012, 06:59:18 AM http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=dw-wetzel_alabama_lsu_bad_bcs_title_game_010912
Title: Re: Dan Wetzel...SMH Post by: rueben on January 10, 2012, 07:13:03 AM When the Name of your only book is "Death To..." it's pretty da#@ apparent you're a hater.
Title: Re: Dan Wetzel...SMH Post by: td57 on January 10, 2012, 07:25:39 AM Professionals (or wannabes) should not show just how bad butt hurt they are.
:'( :'( :'( Title: Re: Dan Wetzel...SMH Post by: BAMAWV on January 10, 2012, 07:25:40 AM This piece of garbage should never be given what he craves, --attention. Especially on a Bama message board. WTH
Title: Re: Dan Wetzel...SMH Post by: carl childers on January 10, 2012, 08:17:29 AM yawn
Title: Re: Dan Wetzel...SMH Post by: SeniorTSM on January 10, 2012, 08:30:45 AM Sorry guys but it was on the front page of Yahoo this morning when i logged in.
I think the BCS will get a plus one next year, so then the number 5 team can cry. Title: Re: Dan Wetzel...SMH Post by: Catch Prothro on January 10, 2012, 09:21:43 AM Ironic that he complains about lack of offense, and yearns for TD happy bowls, when he also admits that the lowest rated BCS Bowl of all time was also the highest scoring, WVU v. Clemson
And, in point of fact, last night's BCS Championship game had higher ratings than several prior BCS Championship games (and those were televised on networks, not cable.) Last night's TV ratings were higher than Bama's win over Texas in 2009, Texas v. USC, Okahoma v. USC, and Miami v. Ohio State. Kinda ironic that three of those four games involved Big12 teams? Title: Re: Dan Wetzel...SMH Post by: cbbama99 on January 10, 2012, 09:23:39 AM This is the problem I have with Wetzel. He is actually a good writer, but he spends entirely too much time bashing the BCS. Every other column or so is about how much he hates it. You know Dan, there ARE other things in the sports world to write about.
|