TPlaw will donate to tornado relief for every "like" it's Facebook page gets

[Marshal Dillon]

What's a spam post? Someone trying to sell something?

[BAMAWV]

Ricky don't ever listen to anyone who tries to discourage you from doing what you have a passion for.

Yellowpope is right, except when you have a passion for disrupting an entire Forum board.

If you pay a little attention, the new topics on our board are at the top. They are the first ones everyone goes to for new information. But when someone makes a comment on an old thread,-- instead of dropping off the board it goes back to the top. Then the new topics get mixed in with the old, and the natural flow is disrupted.

Sometimes a poster may have a relevent comment on an old thread, or new information. This is understandable, even healthy, since it furthers the conversation. But "golly gee, I think you are right" does nothing but clutter the board. Hope this helps!

[SUPERCOACH]

What's a spam post? Someone trying to sell something?

Yes, typically a link to a web site that sells stuff.

[yellowpope]

Well now I have been told that by 2 people so I guess he can just post what he wants to and I will too. RTR!

That leaves over 400 posters who haven't said to post as much as you want. You might want to think about that.

452 members. 332 (roughly) have never posted. The number we're working with now is 120 "posting members," meaning that 120 members have at least one post. We can safely knock that number down to a core group of "regular posting members," (we'll set the number to be considered a regular posting member at 50 posts) and that number is 45 posters. So now we are down from our original number of 452 to 45. I make that point only because it is relevant to discredit you as a source of accurate information. Furthermore, the burden of proof is not on Ricky to prove that others approve of him, it is on you to prove that others disapprove of him, which you have not done, nor will be able to. I say all this to re-quote my mother, "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all." Ricky is a class act and is the kind of person most of the people here strive to be: A tender-hearted, God-fearing, genuine caring person. There is no reason to attack, criticize, or discourage Ricky in any way and the ones who do so should be ashamed of themselves.

EDIT: After further checking, it seems that the member directory only lists around 300 members instead of all 452 which is strange in itself. It seems that the board stats could wrong and there are only 300 members. It's quite confusing for it to say 452 one place and only list 300 but whatever. That changes my numbers but the idea undoubtedly remains the same.

[BAMAWV]

Well now I have been told that by 2 people so I guess he can just post what he wants to and I will too. RTR!

That leaves over 400 posters who haven't said to post as much as you want. You might want to think about that.

452 members. 332 (roughly) have never posted. The number we're working with now is 120 "posting members," meaning that 120 members have at least one post. We can safely knock that number down to a core group of "regular posting members," (we'll set the number to be considered a regular posting member at 50 posts) and that number is 45 posters. So now we are down from our original number of 452 to 45. I make that point only because it is relevant to discredit you as a source of accurate information. Furthermore, the burden of proof is not on Ricky to prove that others approve of him, it is on you to prove that others disapprove of him, which you have not done, nor will be able to. I say all this to re-quote my mother, "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all." Ricky is a class act and is the kind of person most of the people here strive to be: A tender-hearted, God-fearing, genuine caring person. There is no reason to attack, criticize, or discourage Ricky in any way and the ones who do so should be ashamed of themselves.

EDIT: After further checking, it seems that the member directory only lists around 300 members instead of all 452 which is strange in itself. It seems that the board stats could wrong and there are only 300 members. It's quite confusing for it to say 452 one place and only list 300 but whatever. That changes my numbers but the idea undoubtedly remains the same.

Not one sole on this board has attacked Ricky's character, nor would it be condoned on THIS board. What are you trying to start and why?

[yellowpope]

Well now I have been told that by 2 people so I guess he can just post what he wants to and I will too. RTR!

That leaves over 400 posters who haven't said to post as much as you want. You might want to think about that.

452 members. 332 (roughly) have never posted. The number we're working with now is 120 "posting members," meaning that 120 members have at least one post. We can safely knock that number down to a core group of "regular posting members," (we'll set the number to be considered a regular posting member at 50 posts) and that number is 45 posters. So now we are down from our original number of 452 to 45. I make that point only because it is relevant to discredit you as a source of accurate information. Furthermore, the burden of proof is not on Ricky to prove that others approve of him, it is on you to prove that others disapprove of him, which you have not done, nor will be able to. I say all this to re-quote my mother, "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all." Ricky is a class act and is the kind of person most of the people here strive to be: A tender-hearted, God-fearing, genuine caring person. There is no reason to attack, criticize, or discourage Ricky in any way and the ones who do so should be ashamed of themselves.

EDIT: After further checking, it seems that the member directory only lists around 300 members instead of all 452 which is strange in itself. It seems that the board stats could wrong and there are only 300 members. It's quite confusing for it to say 452 one place and only list 300 but whatever. That changes my numbers but the idea undoubtedly remains the same.

Not one sole on this board has attacked Ricky's character, nor would it be condoned on THIS board. What are you trying to start and why?

I never once mentioned anything about attacking Ricky's character. I referenced attacking him, discouraging him, and criticizing him, all as a poster. That has been done and it is disappointing to say the least. Ricky is defenseless, because he has chosen to turn the other cheek, but I'm not going to sit around a watch him be discouraged for doing something he loves.

[BAMAWV]

I am the King of inane, useless comments. Ricky can't even carry my dinner bucket. But even I realize that making goofy comments on threads that are about to drop off to page 2 is unnecessary clutter. You know this too. That is why I am suspicious of your motives. Don't start trouble and there won't be none.

[yellowpope]

Think it, don't say it.

Can we end this at that(to assure you that my motives are pure.)? I think there is no reason to argue. We know how I feel, we know how MD feels, we know how you feel. I respect your opinion and would like to conclude this without any further mention of Ricky.

[BAMAWV]

Think it, don't say it.

Can we end this at that? I think there is no reason to argue. We know how I feel, we know how MD feels, we know how you feel. I respect your opinion and would like to conclude this without any further mention of Ricky.

I agree. This would be a good time to shake hands and part e-friends, before I mention how you failed to defend Ricky of having sex with chickens over on WA.

[yellowpope]

Think it, don't say it.

Can we end this at that? I think there is no reason to argue. We know how I feel, we know how MD feels, we know how you feel. I respect your opinion and would like to conclude this without any further mention of Ricky.

I agree. This would be a good time to shake hands and part e-friends, before I mention how you failed to defend Ricky of having sex with chickens over on WA.

I have been very fair in my comments when CRS has been mentioned at WA. That being said, I have never seen that statement, I am not doubting its existence, just that I have no recollection of seeing it. I would much rather be the target than it be Ricky though so say what you will about me. All that being said, :handshake:

[BAMAWV]

Think it, don't say it.

Can we end this at that? I think there is no reason to argue. We know how I feel, we know how MD feels, we know how you feel. I respect your opinion and would like to conclude this without any further mention of Ricky.

I agree. This would be a good time to shake hands and part e-friends, before I mention how you failed to defend Ricky of having sex with chickens over on WA.

I have been very fair in my comments when CRS has been mentioned at WA. That being said, I have never seen that statement, I am not doubting its existence, just that I have no recollection of seeing it.

With all due respect---NONSENSE!

[yellowpope]

Think it, don't say it.

Can we end this at that? I think there is no reason to argue. We know how I feel, we know how MD feels, we know how you feel. I respect your opinion and would like to conclude this without any further mention of Ricky.

I agree. This would be a good time to shake hands and part e-friends, before I mention how you failed to defend Ricky of having sex with chickens over on WA.

I have been very fair in my comments when CRS has been mentioned at WA. That being said, I have never seen that statement, I am not doubting its existence, just that I have no recollection of seeing it.

With all due respect---NONSENSE!

I'm going to take a lesson from Ricky and turning the other cheek. You will get no further replies from me here. I have done what I set out to do and that is defend Ricky. I hope that results in the end of this thread.

[Guest]

Username:
Password:
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

There aren't any users online.

Loading Tweet...